000 02521cam a2200265 i 4500
999 _c31907
_d31907
010 _a 2015014456
020 _a9780226304854
082 0 0 _a340.14 SL OR
100 1 _aSlocum, Brian G.
_97261
245 1 0 _aOrdinary meaning :
_ba theory of the most fundamental principle of legal interpretation
_cBrian G. Slocum
260 _aChicago :
_bThe University of Chicago press,
_cc2015.
300 _ax, 355 p. :
_bill. ;
_c24 cm.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 323-344) and index.
520 _aConsider this court case: a defendant has traded a gun for drugs, and there is a criminal sentencing provision that stipulates an enhanced punishment if the defendant "uses" a firearm "during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime." Buying the drugs was obviously a crime - but can it be said that the defendant actually "used" the gun? This is the sort of question at the heart of legal interpretation. The field is built around one key question: by what standard should legal texts be interpreted? The traditional doctrine is that words should be given their "ordinary meaning": words in legal texts should be interpreted in light of accepted standards of communication. Yet often, courts fail to properly consider context, refer to unsuitable dictionary definitions, or otherwise misconceive how the ordinary meaning of words should be determined. In this book, Brian Slocum builds his argument for a new method of interpretation by asking glaring, yet largely ignored, questions. What makes one particular meaning the "ordinary" one, and how exactly do courts conceptualize the elements of ordinary meaning? Ordinary Meaning provides a much-needed, revised framework, boldly instructing those involved with the law in how the components of ordinary meaning should properly be identified and developed in our modern legal system.
650 0 _aLaw
_vLanguage
_99278
650 0 _aCommunication in law
_97263
650 0 _aLaw
_vTerminology
_97264
650 0 _aLaw
_vInterpretation and construction
_99279
650 0 _aLaw
_xUnited States
_vTerminology
_99280
856 _uhttps://uowd.box.com/s/15dbxgfo8qabu6tmc3g5tvw68u9afpal
_zLocation Map