000 | 02639cam a2200241Mi 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c32679 _d32679 |
||
001 | nam a22 7a 4500 | ||
020 | _a9781350047693 | ||
020 | _a1350047694 | ||
082 | _a207.501 HA RE | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHand, Michael _911000 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aIs religious education possible? : _ba philosophical investigation _cMichael Hand |
260 |
_aLondon : _bBloomsbury Publishing, _c2017. |
||
300 |
_a160 p. ; _c23 cm. |
||
490 | 1 | _aContinuum Studies in Research in Education | |
505 | 0 | _aForeword; 1 A Philosophical Problem; Introduction; The philosophical debate; Paul Hirst; Roger Marples; David Attfield; Peter Gardner; A related debate; Conclusion; 2 Understanding a Form of Knowledge; Introduction; The forms of knowledge thesis; Hirst''s presentation of the thesis; Criticisms of Hirst; Knowledge, propositions and truth; A restatement of the thesis; Understanding a form of knowledge; Conclusion; 3 Is there a Religious Form of Knowledge?; Introduction; Six accounts of religious belief; Wittgenstein; D.Z. Phillips; W.D. Hudson; John Wisdom; Allen Brent. | |
505 | 8 | _aMichael Leahy and Ronald LauraConclusion; 4 The Meaning of Religious Propositions; Introduction; The concept of religion; Metaphorical applications of the term ''religion''; Two criteria of religion; Two anxieties about the concept of religion; The meaning of religious propositions; The concept of god; A note on the term ''God''; The logic of disputes about gods; Conclusion; 5 Mental and Material Propositions; Introduction; Mental and material propositions; The autonomy of mental propositions; Descartes'' argument; The behaviourist case; Knowledge without observation. | |
505 | 8 | _aThe problem of other mindsConclusion; 6 Conclusion; Bibliography; Index; A; B; C; D; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; O; P; R; S; T; V; W; Z. | |
520 | _aIs Religious Education Possible?: A Philosophical Investigation tackles a well-established problem in the philosophy of education. The problem is the threat posed to the logical possibility of non-confessional religious education by the claim that religion constitutes an autonomous language-game or form of knowledge. Defenders of this claim argue that religion cannot be understood from the outside: it is impossible to impart religious understanding unless one is also prepared to impart religious belief. Michael Hand argues for two central points: first, that non-confessional religious educat. | ||
650 | 4 |
_aReligious education _xPhilosophy _914688 |
|
830 | 0 |
_aContinuum studies in research in education. _911002 |
|
856 |
_uhttps://uowd.box.com/s/j52xtkj74oxaztnlchcm8kl3lvdw5qnz _zLocation Map |
||
942 | _cREGULAR |