Students' understanding of research methodology in the context of dynamics of scientific progress
By: Niaz, Mansoor
Title By: Rivas, Mayra
Material type: BookSeries: Publisher: Switzerland : Springer, c2016.Description: xii, 58 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.ISBN: 978-3319320397Subject(s): Science -- Study and teaching | Science -- Experiments -- Methodology | SCIENCE / Study & TeachingDDC classification: . Online resources: Location MapItem type | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGULAR | University of Wollongong in Dubai Main Collection | 507.8 NI ST (Browse shelf) | Available | T0055189 |
, Shelving location: Main Collection Close shelf browser
507.1 DE VE Developing science literacy in the 21st century | 507.2 SA AP Applications of field-programmable gate arrays in scientific research | 507.21 GR RE Research methods : | 507.8 NI ST Students' understanding of research methodology in the context of dynamics of scientific progress | 507.8 PA MY Mythbusters : | 507.8 ZI MY Mythbusters : | 508.07442134 FO DR Dry storeroom no. 1 : |
Introduction -- Theoretical Framework -- Method -- Results and Discussion -- Conclusions and Educational Implications -- Appendix 1 (Study Guide based on the Millikan-Ehrenhaft Controversy) -- References
This book discusses how to improve high school students understanding of research methodology based on alternative interpretations of data, role of controversies, creativity and the scientific method, in the context of the oil drop experiment. These aspects form an important part of the nature of science (NOS). The study reported in this volume is is based on a reflective, explicit and activity-based approach to teaching nature of science (NOS) that can facilitate high school students understanding of how scientists elaborate theoretical frameworks, design experiments, report data that leads to controversies and finally with the collaboration of the scientific community a consensus is reached. Most students changed their perspective and drew concept maps in which they emphasized the creative, accumulative, controversial nature of science and the scientific method. "